![]() These included having a specialist licence in general practice or occupational health care and the location of the practice, but not gender or age. Instead, some other independent predictors for more frequent use of brief intervention were found. Of the respondents 9.4% reported doing brief intervention regularly and 50.0% occasionally. AUDIT scores did not significantly predict either regular or occasional use of brief intervention. Results: The prevalence of heavy drinkers based on AUDIT score (≥8) was 14.5% among all physicians, 7.0% among females and 27.0% among males. Odds ratios from multinomial regression analysis were calculated for self-reported frequency (never, occasionally or regularly) of conducting brief interventions by physicians with AUDIT scores of 0-1, 2, 3, 4, 5-7 or ≥8. Methods: Cross-sectional self-administered questionnaire survey to all 3193 physicians providing primary health care in Finland. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Volume 83, Issue 2, 28 June 2006, Pages 169-173īackground: To define whether the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores of primary care physicians themselves predict their willingness to use brief alcohol intervention. ![]() ![]() Validation in Different Populations Publicationĭo primary care physicians' own AUDIT scores predict their use of brief alcohol intervention? A cross-sectional survey.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |